Options trade review yahoo fantasy football

Pro League managers have 2 days to lodge an official protest with the Yahoo Sports League Office. Public and Private Leagues use a veto process with league votes and Pro League managers can file a protest with the League Office to initiate the trade review process. Notes left by managers involved in the trade are taken into consideration. Protests must contain a description of why the trade should be vetoed. All votes are recorded anonymously. NOTE: As a reminder, The ESPN Standard league default trade review period is 24 hours. Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. ET on Friday in a league with a 24 hour Trade Review period.

Major League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of MLB. Major League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are use with permission of the applicable MLB entities. Started a league last year and after being in several leagues where very bad trades happen. There is nothing right or moral about that. As long as not collusion I say let it fly quick! And it came at the right time for me, too, to start this league.

Voters are always short sighted and selfishly motivated. Afterwards, the commissioner then makes a final decision. Hot Topic and a definite button that when pressed gets many responses. There is absolutely no place for a veto vote in a dynasty league. Veto for a trade to be blocked. In most cases, it makes sense. But this type of stuff happens all of the time. Simply sick of one owner making all of the trades in your league? Just petty jealousy and selfishness.

Trades should really only be reversed or stopped if there is reason to suspect collusion anyway. So if you pay your money to play, you should be able to do what you want to with your players! Could take you a week to get 2 done. We use the standard 2 day rule so a trade would have to be complete on a Tuesday to go through in time for Thursdays game. Here we go again with another discussion on how morality fits into fantasy football. Something that is sure to create drama at some point down the road. Vote the trade down. What about trades that go down Thur morning before a Thur night game?

So while in theory league voting on trades is a good idea, in reality it is most definitely not the right thing to do. Leave some comments or join our discussion on this topic in the forums. Like I said, just a small sample size example! None of us wants to see another team in the league taken advantage of and it is the right thing to do to stop that from happening. So what is your take on this issue? Warehouse faithful to tell me. Award people for voting? Sunday games or Thursday night games? Then all of a sudden you trade with another team.

Cause you might have to wait 2 days to get the votes on the first one. But in this system, everyone loses. If your league has this rule it is opening a big can of worms that morally corrupt owners can take advantage of. So then what do you do if you cannot get the entire league to vote? This opens agreed upon trades up for discussion and if anyone votes for Veto it is not done in secret. This would be a better option IMO but why should someone be awarded for doing something they should do anyway? In this case it is more the side effect than the actual decision that leads us to the topic of morality. This is the whole point of the article above, is that owners are preventing a good team from getting better.

Either way, I do not like putting trades to a league vote because it can actually work against the reason for the rule as others have hinted to. Too many variables involved when voting. You are allowing every member of your league a say on what happens when trades are proposed and made. It is true, most owners value players differently. Happy trading and best of luck the rest of the offseason and the 2013 year! Try it and see how it affects the strategies. What do you do next? They are trying to benefit their team and playing for themselves. What happens when multiple league owners gang up to stop a trade between two honest and willing owners? Some are in win now mode, others building for the future, some always want a balance of older and younger players.

This is extreme but you know what I mean. That was it, done deal, satisfied with answers. Time for a fresh comment! Those differences are what usually makes for good deals, deals that make sense. Then, the rest of the league can voice their opinions publicly before you decide your final decision. Vetoing should not be allowed. All voting does is delay your current and probably next trade.

There have been no outcries, no rants on the league site. Likewise if the league suspects collusion a vote will stop the cheating from occurring thus protecting the league and serving the greater good. From the perspective of another playoff team it certainly feels this way. It is a moral thing. Voting may appear to be something that prevents collusion. This makes it fair right? You might consider a redraft league if you believe in only playing within the confines of the present season. By having this rule in your league you are enabling this type of behavior. As a result, allowing league voting on trades, at least on the surface, is a good thing.

All trades are dealt with by the discretion of the owners unless their is some form of collusion that comes to the surface. Who are you to say how I should run my team? People have different values. Together we can all decide if league voting on trades is truly right or wrong. But, how long does this all take before you have to make a decision? If you need to play in leagues that you rely on your teammates to protect you in the trade process you should not trade. Then you have an incomplete poll. Who wants to be penalized for life being busy and not voting? Vote his or her trades down.

Other leagues are just becoming a strung of squabbles and sweetheart deals from guys quitting on the league. This takes the exact mechanic of votes for veto but subtly changes the voting to a public forum. We are all big boys and girls and can make up our own minds. You could penalize teams for not voting because to me EVERY TEAM FOR EVERY POLL SHOULD VOTE when it comes to trades and rule changes if you are going to force voting on trades. We all love and play this game with the hopes of it being drama free and fun for all. The team that got you to the playoffs should be the team that helps you win the trophy. In only one case I called the two owners just to assess what they were looking for in the deal. What if you just had problems with a team on trade talks.

With this approach it is WAY too not difficult for people to not only take advantage of the rule but to exploit it primarily for their own benefit. NEVER have voting allowed for trade approvals! What more could you do? NO on trades just out of spite! If you are a commish that wants the league to vote on trades because you feel it protects your ability to process them then you shouldnt commish or you should assign a member of your league to be the trade police and monitor them so your rep is not tarnished. Its as not difficult as that in any fantasy sport and that dynamic, I think, makes fantasy sports very intriguing for owners and commissioners. Not only that, but not everyone will agree that what these owners are doing is actually wrong. FJax was killing it before he got hurt. These owners are the ones trading away Ingram after season 1 for Fred Jackson.

So is it right or is it wrong? That is, after all, why we play this game in the first place. To win at any cost right? If someone starts sniping while you use this system you could have both owners give reasoning or justification of their side of the trade. Portions copyright by STATS LLC. So not only did you just state the obvious in the fact that I cant submit my own protest but you also told me to feel free to let you know If I have anymore questions and then you tell me I can reply to this email. This is an extremely unfair trade and we have no commissioner to email and no one that responds to my complaints is helping. Good luck, you got a raw deal.

It really makes yahoo seem incompetent. If no writes me back with a decent response I am considering getting a lawyer. You should get on the Twitter or other social media platforms with this message. This was by no means an unwise trade it was unfair. League Office to prevent coaches from making unwise trades, but rather to simply make sure that all coaches in a league are competing on a level and fair playing field. An injured steve smith who is out for the rest of the season is not a fair deal for Charcandrick west who has been getting 18 pt games! Also I sent many complaints in attempt to get this resolved with proper response.

ALL league managers have the opportunity to lodge a protest against a given trade with the league office. Steve smith is a beast when he is on the field and ricky west for steve smith makes alot of sense if steve smith was healthy. Yahoo Sports League Office. You cannot protest a trade that you are involved in. All league managers have the opportunity to lodge a protest against a given trade with the league office. The other player had 2 days to accept the trade but chose not to untill steve smith was injured! So with all my emails that should have triggered a review by the yahoo sports league and yet NO ONE REVIEWED THIS! Any notes made by either manager involved in the trade, either when proposing or accepting the trade, will be included in the review process. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of STATS LLC is strictly prohibited.

This is an extremely unprofessional company, I have been going though yahoo fantasy sports for years and never had issues like this. All decisions on trade protests are final, and no approved trade will ever be reversed. This is against your terms and I feel cheated out of my money and my time through this organization that is supposed to have rules and integrity. He has the potential to dominate in ERA, WHIP, W, K and Hits Surrendered. IT IS SO ORDERED. Statistics are cumulative throughout the course of the season and there are no head to head games contained within the Roto league. Some people argue that trading established talent unfairly affects the balance of the league for the current season, even if the deal is made for players who will help the other team in the future. He also received two emails from other league members protesting the validity of this trade.

This is exactly where Strasburg profiles. Commissioners are constantly under more scrutiny than the other members of the league simply because of the power and authority that is granted with such a position. On the other hand, the Winners will be in a better position to improve its standing in various pitching categories with the addition of Lee. Of course, Cliff Lee is an established star pitcher with a more limited projected upside only because he is nine years older than Strasburg. The second part deals with a league commissioner who took matters into his own hands in evaluating the subject trade and changed the rules without providing any notice to the league that he was doing so. Since Strasburg is currently on the DL and rehabbing in the minor leagues, he is not likely to have much of an impact categorically for SSS this season. However, this goes to the heart of why people opt to do keeper leagues. League commissioners should enforce all rules and guidelines consistently.

Lee is 32 years old. Given that, the Court sees no problem with the subject trade and recommends that the league approve it. Furthermore, he is 32 years old and does have a history of back injuries. Given that this is not at issue, the Court will not consider it in its analysis. As he gets older and naturally loses velocity, some of his pitches will remain in the strike zone and can be planted in the stands instead of being routine outs. As a protective measure, the Commissioner can offer certain suggestions to ensure such an event does not take place again. In my opinion Strasburg for Lee in a keeper league near the trade deadline is a fair trade. Should the Commissioner have unilaterally changed the settings and procedures for reviewing trades from league vote to commissioner approval? While this trade may have its share of detractors and critics, it is certainly justifiable from both parties based on their respective submissions.

He, like many other pitchers, underwent Tommy John surgery and seems to be all but recovered within a year. However, several pitchers have made full recoveries from Tommy John surgery over the past few years and have performed even better than before the operation. Future value has to be taken into account. The reason teams in keeper leagues trade established stars in exchange for young, cheap talent is to rebuild for the future and sacrifice the present. As such, league commissioners should be cognizant of the perception of whatever decisions they make because they will be analyzed under a very thick microscope. There is no formal league Constitution in place to govern the league. See Cajon Crawdads vs. The Winners have also made a submission to the Court in support of its position. Basically, it would be like a reversal of the waiver process.

The Commissioner has conceded that there is no suspicion or allegations of collusion between the teams. Whether a trade is intelligent or popular will not be part of the analysis. The reasons for this are obvious, but must be restated. It is the exact type of roster management that keeper league team owners must consider when faced with the reality that there is no longer any hope for success in the current season. Another recent defensive trend that is rapidly spreading throughout the game. SHOULD THE TRADE BETWEEN SSS AND THE WINNERS BE UPHELD AND APPROVED? It is likely he will only decline in value as his price goes up. Here, no explanation was provided before the Commissioner made his decision. That in itself does not present an issue.

On one hand, there is a former Cy Young Award star pitcher on arguably the best team in baseball who contributes significantly in all major pitching categories except saves. In terms of keeper league status, this is where the only viable arguments can be made in determining that there is equal value. There is no reason to think that Strasburg will not overcome the injury and fulfill his potential. DL spots on the roster. That is the first part of the case below. The virtue of a trade is measured in both quantifiable criteria and subjective needs of the teams involved.

He dominated several of his starts and put up impressive fantasy numbers before being shut down with an elbow injury. The motivation to build for the future is a justifiable reason to trade away current talent for prospects. Contending teams have to weigh the importance of keeper prospects vs. Winners based on what I believe was a good valuation of Strasburg in the context of a keeper league. Strasburg is out for having Tommy John surgery, not a shoulder issue. This action was met with stern opposition from several members of the league. But where is the line drawn in terms of what is best for the league? Winners, currently in third place. SHOULD THE COMMISSIONER HAVE UNILATERALLY CHANGED THE SETTINGS AND PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING TRADES FROM LEAGUE VOTE TO COMMISSIONER APPROVAL? It is true that Strasburg is coming back from major elbow surgery.

The procedure in place for approving or rejecting trades was set by the Commissioner to be a league vote, which has been the custom and practice of the league since its inception in 2005. The notion that Strasburg is out for the year is not completely accurate either. Using this criteria to objectively evaluate trades will help maintain the integrity of the league and allow teams the freedom to manage their rosters how they see fit. Lee is a good pitcher a good price, but the upside is not there. If Cliff Lee was traded for an unknown, obscure prospect with pedestrian statistics, then perhaps these arguments would have merit. The Court already knows what he is capable of given his limited body of work in 2010. When healthy, Strasburg possesses unlimited potential to dominate fantasy categories similar to Roy Halladay and Justin Verlander.

The Court has always held that the approval or rejection of a trade is based purely on its fairness, free from collusion, and in the best interests of the league. The Commissioner emailed both Winners and SSS explaining that he had to reject the trade because it was inequitable. There is a high success rate for pitchers who undergo Tommy John surgery. He just threw a simulated game and is on track for a possible rehab start in the minors and potentially some starts at the major league level in September. As a result, there were no specific positional needs by either team. If the Commissioner makes an exception for someone, it should be explained thoroughly why such an exception to the rules exist.

As a result, the Commissioner should not have changed the league settings dealing with how trades are reviewed in the middle of the season. Here, the Commissioner of the Moritz League has run the league since 2005 operating under the same guidelines and procedures with respect to reviewing trades. Strasburg certainly lived up to the hype in 2010 when he was called up by the Washington Nationals. This is a classic case of trading current superstars for future stars in a keeper league. One example includes the creation of a league Constitution which would include language encompassing all possible scenarios that require decisions or judgments. At first glance, the trade of Cliff Lee for Stephen Strasburg looks uneven when viewing the deal in a vacuum. While Lee is certainly a valuable fantasy baseball pitcher, his recent playoff domination has overshadowed his pedestrian regular season performances since 2008. Fortunately for the Commissioner of the Moritz League, he recognized what he had done and changed the settings back.

The concern expressed by the Commissioner and several other league members is that the trade itself is not equitable or fair, and that it disrupts the integrity of the league by essentially giving the Winners, currently in third place, a windfall by acquiring an ace pitcher in Cliff Lee for an unknown future asset. Should the trade between SSS and the Winners be upheld and approved? The trade was made without the specter of collusion and a benefit was provided to both teams. Despite the fact there is no league Constitution, the rules and guidelines have essentially become common law due to their longevity and consistency. Until then, SSS would have the option of picking up the No. Because being the commissioner requires an inordinate amount of extra time spent on the league to effectuate rules and handle any administrative issues that arise, the Court advocates for league commissioners to have a certain amount of authority, autonomy and discretion to run and administer their leagues accordingly. The decision was based purely on keeper value in a dynasty context. When the Commissioner initially received notice of this trade, he immediately thought it was inequitable due to SSS only receiving an injured pitcher with no current contributions and diminished future value. The Court has no issues with the idea of trading superstar players so long as the package in return is equitable and makes sense given the needs of both teams. Philadelphia, but the risk is a reality and age is a factor.

Each team is limited to making 45 transactions per season. Here, a trade was proposed and agreed to between two teams on the opposite ends of the standings. This trade involves the even exchange of starting pitchers. When a league commissioner ignores complaints or differences of opinion from a majority of the league members, it is likely he is not considering what is best for the league in general. In a keeper league, teams that are having unsuccessful seasons are more likely to continue to pay attention and make moves that will set themselves up for better success in the following season. The Court recommends that the Commissioner issue a written apology to the league simply stating that his actions were benevolent in nature even though he was procedurally improper in his actions. The standard of review has been that people pay money to purchase a team in a league, draft their team, and manage it accordingly.

Feel free to leave your thoughts and comments on this case. The next part of the analysis centers around the particular categorical needs by each team.